The best hard drive for gaming today is an SSD. Jokes aside, today, SSDs are the ones that rule and deliver the best performance results. For a long time, hard drives were the ones to do that, but time has surpassed them. Although they are still used in a large number of gaming computers, the fact i.

Plug-and-Play Interoperability Between Windows and MacHelsinki, Finland and Kanazawa, Japan – October 28, 2014 – Tuxera Inc., the market leader in interoperable file system solutions, announced today that licenses to provide the users of the recently released, stylish line of portable hard drives with full Mac compatibility.Mac OS X comes with limited, read-only support for Microsoft Windows NTFS formatted volumes out of the box. Tuxera NTFS for Mac providing much needed read-write interoperability across Windows and Mac OS X platforms. Advanced Tuxera-only features include fast file transfer speeds and complete data integrity with a smart caching layer. The software supports all versions of Mac OS X including, and is being continuously improved in sync with Apple’s technology.“We focus on providing our customers with a variety of user-friendly, high-quality and reliable products for every need. Tuxera NTFS for Mac enables everyone to easily access, swap, edit and store all the data between PC and Mac hassle-free.

Tuxera solutions fit perfectly into our strategy, meeting personalized expectations of the consumer,” commented Koichi Teramae, Section Manager of Product Planning Section3 from I-O DATA.I-O DATA is a top-tier Japanese peripheral equipment company known for outstanding quality and environmentally friendly design. With customer convenience in mind, its focus is in the technology innovation, seamless performance and ease of use. I-O DATA includes more than 3000 different storage products.“Our expert engineering team is actively contributing to I-O DATA’s ongoing projects to improve the overall digital experience,” noted Kanae Kubota, Director of Software Solutions at Tuxera.

“We strongly believe that Tuxera’s technical expertise and considerable experience on the market supports our partners’ efforts in their ongoing and future businesses.”Tuxera solves complex interoperability challenges leveraging on in file system and media streaming technologies, recognized open source leadership and long-standing capabilities in Android, Mac OS X and Linux software development among others.For more information please contact:Karolina MosiadzMarketing and Communicationspress@tuxera.comAbout I-O DATA DEVICE, INC.:I-O DATA DEVICE, INC. Is a top-tier manufacturer and provider of high-quality computer peripherals and interface products to the global consumer and OEM markets. Founded in 1976, by Mr. Akio Hosono, I-O DATA has received recognition as Japan’s undisputed market leader within the PC Peripheral industry. I-O DATA is not only a manufacturer of such devices, but handles the design, development, and production of the products. I-O DATA DEVICE,INC.

Is located at 3-10, Sakurada-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8512, JAPAN. For more information, please visit:About Tuxera:Tuxera is the leading provider of file systems that allow music, pictures, videos and other content to be ported across mobiles, tablets, home entertainment, consumer, industrial or any other electronics. Tuxera’s industry-standard file system solutions for Android, Linux, Mac OS X and other platforms have hundreds of millions installations. Close collaboration with industry leaders ensures reliable compatibility and helps to set high standard in performance, low power use for embedded and mobile solutions. For more information, please visit.

Who are we?We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data - legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g.

Chart Topping Drum Fills (2014). Dawn Richardson's Fill Workbook: Short Fills and the Tools to Create Your Own (2005). The complete Drumming System is the most comprehensive home study course for. This PDF workbook features sheet music for lessons on the first. Essential Drum Fills (Book &. Dell Inspiron 1300 Manual Pdf Pdf. Encyclopedia of drum fills pdf workbook. Download Encyclopedia of Drum Fills. Share & Embed 'Encyclopedia of Drum Fills' Please copy and paste this embed script to where you want to embed.

Government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Timetm). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.We are one.

We are legion. And we're trying really hard not to forget.- from.Links!!.Rule(s).Be excellent to each other.isn't.No memes or.No unapproved sale threads.Related Subreddits. I am an event photographer/videographer, sometimes shooting upwards of 300-500GB per event. I recently returned from one with 600GB of footage.

I am aware of the 3-2-1 rule, etc., and I have more than a few hard drives already, including my main 4TB desktop drive.That being said, for convenience and organization's sake, I don't want to split up my media library amongst many drives. Plugging and unplugging several drives to locate a particular shoot is annoying to me. Honestly, I am just tired of juggled multiple hard drives all the time.So. Would a RAID array be best?

I would probably juggle between Mac and Win. Is that possible?

Can I format a RAID in exFAT? Sorry, I'm very tech literate, but have no experience with RAID (and networking is basically black magic to me)I am not (yet) commercial, so a failed drive won't be the end of the world.

Raid5 looked appealing to me because you get more storage space, lol. Annoyingly enough, it sounds like the enclosure I listed above does not support raid6.Can you tell me more about zfs? Sorry, being lazy. I can google it too. ZFS is an error checking file system basically, which means that every time files are transferred/saved/edited/etc. It make sure that no errors arise in one of the disks in the RAID array that could later propagate and make the file corrupt/wrong. Single bit errors are not super uncommon in HDD storage, and ZFS protects against them, and also against HDD failure during file transfer corrupting files.You need a bit more RAM (1gb ram/TB storage is recommended) than many traditional file systems, and you'll also need to make sure it's ECC (Error Correcting) RAM, since ZFS holds data in RAM while verifying it.

See the dicussion below, I was wrong.EDIT: Usually you would have a small (or in the case of ZFS somewhat larger to accomodate the RAM) computer handling the ZFS filesystem, and then presenting a network drive using some software, so any computer could connect to it. CIFS is a really common way of doing that.

In that way, your Windows or Mac machines don't have to worry about what filesystem is being run on your NAS. This also guarantees easy and maximum interoperability between devices, no need to physically transfer hard drives, can edit files from a laptop, etc.

Etc.There's a lot of benefits to going with Network Attached Storage, but I'd be wary of ZFS. Ah, after doing a bit of research it seems I was wrong about the GB ram/TB storage thing. I'd heard it from multiple sources but I've read some posts from ZFS devs now that says it's basically an old wive's tale, and ZFS will function fine on much less RAM.

I've seen conflicting things as to exactly how much, but most report 4-8GB is sufficient for basically any amount of storage.And secondly, it doesn't hold the data itself in RAM (any more-so than any file system passes data through RAM), but instead just uses RAM for the cache, which is changed/purged as needed to suit the RAM available.Some posts claim that a system with as little as 1GB of RAM can handle ZFS with (somewhat) arbitrarily large volumes, pools, or users with little to no performance degradation. All in all, my mistake. I shouldn't have parroted information without verifying it.EDIT: I haven't found anything saying ECC ram isn't important, but I've heard it is on this reddit many times, so personally I'd err on the side of caution, but maybe someone will error correct me lol. EDIT: I haven't found anything saying ECC ram isn't important, but I've heard it is on this reddit many times, so personally I'd err on the side of caution, but maybe someone will error correct me lol.Please read this:It explains both original myth why ECC is critical in ZFS and why it's not true.Also, see quote from one of ZFS developers:​Of course, ECC RAM is good things to have. If it's feasible, I will always recommend it.

But even without ECC there still many advantages of using ZFS.Also, even if you do not use ZFS it would still be good to have ECC RAM. I'd just like to add that very few people outside the data hoarder community use ZFS in their homes.

It is somewhat difficult to set up, and the benefits aren't strictly necessary unless guaranteed integrity of files available 24/7 is very important to you. You can also protect against corruption by doing things like keeping a versioned backup system, i.e.

Storing data at many intervals. There are many softwares like BorgBackup that can make this really easy. Then, if you find a corrupted file, you can traverse backwards in time in your backups until you find a non-corrupted version. This is obviously not perfect, but it's a hell of a lot easier to setup, expand, and maintain than a ZFS NAS.That said, nothing technically beats ZFS in terms of reliability, as far as I know at least. Your data will be about as safe as it can be down to the bit (assuming you also follow reasonable backup procedures).Here's an article that provides a good rundown of whether or not it's right for you.

It very well might be, since your livelihood to some degree depends on the data in question. I also edited my above post to contain a bit more information. Good luck!.

After one of my drobo hardware died, I now exclusively use zfs for all important docs and photos for my home use.I deployed production zfs systems for companies so I'm very aware of the cost associated with it however, I figured at the end, the safety of my files residing in an array that is not hardware locked-in, it gives me much less anxiety if the hardware ever dies as well as features of detecting and correcting bit-rot.Luckily I picked up a 24 bay storage systems the company 'deemed' outdated. So essentially, the cost to recover the hardware was just a power supply. As someone else has already specifically mentioned freenas, I wanted to say that this is also what I would go with.

You're not following anyone yet! My Beatport lets you follow your favorite DJs and labels so you can find out when they release new tracks. So go follow someone! Illusionize down part1 zippy free. Zippyshare.com is completely free, reliable and popular way to store files online. We offer fast download speeds. The maximum filesize for a single file is 500 MB.

However, you did mention that your sets are usually upwards of 300gb which can take a while to upload over a 1gb connection, something to keep in mind. I am personally in the process of adding 10gbe to my freenas setup, which means finding a 10gbe nic that freenas has driver support for, or that I can compile a driver for. You could buy a few 8Tb drives and use your extra SSD as a high speed cache for the freenas setup. I currently have 2 switches with 10gb, but I would not recommend them, each only has 10gb via 2 X2 ports, which I have 10GBase-SR X2 modules. I have 10g between the switches in separate rooms, 10gb to my desktop via a sfp+ nic with a 10Gbase-sr module.

All with fiber runs, I plan to put a 10gb sfp+ nic in my freenas box and connect it to the other switch so I can get up to 10gb between my desktop that I use to manage the Nas and upload media, and the nas. My nics and SFP+ modules are both made by 10gtek, which so far have been both cheap and reliable. And my X2 modules are genuine Cisco.

My switches are also from 2006, don't remember the model off the top of my head, and I'm on travel right now so I can't check. I plan to upgrade switches that support 10GB sfp+ in the future, and will run 10gb over fiber, not copper, because 10gb fiber modules are a fifth of the price, and more than make up for cost of the fiber lines. Sorry for the wall of text, on mobile and playing a game right now. If anything is unclear, I forgot to answer something, or you have more questions, please feel free to hmu again.